ECCouncil 712-50 (EC-Council Certified CISO) Practice Test 37

Question 360

Application accounts do not match approved central entitlements after automated updates. What should the decision-maker choose?

  1. Mover access re-evaluation
  2. Leaver deprovisioning
  3. Orphan account detection
  4. Identity reconciliation
  5. Periodic access recertification

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Reconciliation compares actual access against authoritative assignments and resolves drift. By contrast, Periodic access recertification is relevant when managers cannot demonstrate that long-standing entitlements remain necessary, not as a substitute for Identity reconciliation in this case.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Mover controls reassess privileges against the new job and remove obsolete entitlements; that is relevant if an employee changes departments but keeps sensitive access needed only for the prior role, but it does not directly resolve the need arising when application accounts do not match approved central entitlements after automated updates.

B:

Leaver processes promptly disable credentials, sessions, and related access paths; the condition for this measure is that departed contractors retain working accounts days after their assignments end, whereas the current question concerns a case where application accounts do not match approved central entitlements after automated updates.

C:

Orphan detection finds active identities lacking a responsible person or valid business purpose; the alternative concern is that several service and human accounts have no current documented owner, but the tested need stems from the fact that application accounts do not match approved central entitlements after automated updates.

E:

Recertification requires accountable reviewers to reaffirm or revoke access based on current duties; such an effect addresses a situation where managers cannot demonstrate that long-standing entitlements remain necessary rather than the situation where application accounts do not match approved central entitlements after automated updates.

Question 361

A regulated online service is improving how users prove their identities. Attackers successfully relay one-time codes from fake login pages to real services. What is the best-targeted intervention?

  1. Out-of-band recovery verification
  2. Hardware security key
  3. Phishing-resistant MFA
  4. Adaptive authentication
  5. Account lockout policy
  6. Credential rotation after compromise

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Origin-bound authenticators such as FIDO2 passkeys resist credential relay to lookalike sites. By contrast, Account lockout policy is relevant when repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account, not as a substitute for Phishing-resistant MFA in this case.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Independent verification through a trusted channel reduces social-engineering risk during recovery; this provides its benefit when a caller claiming to be a director asks the help desk to bypass normal password reset controls; the matter at hand is instead that attackers successfully relay one-time codes from fake login pages to real services.

B:

Security keys perform cryptographic challenge responses while protecting local key material; the alternative concern is that privileged users need a portable authenticator whose private key does not leave the device, but the tested need stems from the fact that attackers successfully relay one-time codes from fake login pages to real services.

D:

Risk-adaptive policies increase required assurance when contextual signals indicate elevated risk; the condition for this measure is that a valid sign-in from a suspicious device should trigger additional verification, whereas the current question concerns a case where attackers successfully relay one-time codes from fake login pages to real services.

E:

Lockout and throttling limit guessing rate while requiring controls against denial-of-service abuse; it would be a fit if repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account, whereas the required response must deal with the fact that attackers successfully relay one-time codes from fake login pages to real services.

F:

Compromise response revokes sessions, resets affected credentials, and investigates unauthorized use; that is relevant if a password is confirmed exposed in a phishing campaign and active sessions may persist, but it does not directly resolve the need arising when attackers successfully relay one-time codes from fake login pages to real services.

Question 362

The team needs a second factor that works offline but recognizes its phishing limitations. What should the decision-maker choose?

  1. Phishing-resistant MFA
  2. Time-based one-time password
  3. Out-of-band recovery verification
  4. Adaptive authentication

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

TOTP generates short-lived codes from a shared secret and time without binding to the genuine site. By contrast, Phishing-resistant MFA is relevant when attackers successfully relay one-time codes from fake login pages to real services, not as a substitute for Time-based one-time password in this case.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Origin-bound authenticators such as FIDO2 passkeys resist credential relay to lookalike sites; the alternative concern is that attackers successfully relay one-time codes from fake login pages to real services, but the tested need stems from the fact that the team needs a second factor that works offline but recognizes its phishing limitations.

C:

Independent verification through a trusted channel reduces social-engineering risk during recovery; the alternative concern is that a caller claiming to be a director asks the help desk to bypass normal password reset controls, but the tested need stems from the fact that the team needs a second factor that works offline but recognizes its phishing limitations.

D:

Risk-adaptive policies increase required assurance when contextual signals indicate elevated risk; the alternative concern is that a valid sign-in from a suspicious device should trigger additional verification, but the tested need stems from the fact that the team needs a second factor that works offline but recognizes its phishing limitations.

Question 363

Privileged users need a portable authenticator whose private key does not leave the device. What action would satisfy this constraint most directly?

  1. Account lockout policy
  2. Out-of-band recovery verification
  3. Session reauthentication
  4. Hardware security key

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Security keys perform cryptographic challenge responses while protecting local key material. By contrast, Account lockout policy is relevant when repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account, not as a substitute for Hardware security key in this case.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Lockout and throttling limit guessing rate while requiring controls against denial-of-service abuse; this is pertinent when repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account, in contrast with the actual gap where privileged users need a portable authenticator whose private key does not leave the device.

B:

Independent verification through a trusted channel reduces social-engineering risk during recovery; it helps when a caller claiming to be a director asks the help desk to bypass normal password reset controls, whereas the present requirement arises because privileged users need a portable authenticator whose private key does not leave the device.

C:

Step-up reauthentication verifies recent user presence before high-impact operations; deploying it would matter if a user changes a sensitive payment instruction in a long-lived authenticated session, but the deciding issue here is that privileged users need a portable authenticator whose private key does not leave the device.

Question 364

A valid sign-in from a suspicious device should trigger additional verification. What approach should the accountable team prioritize?

  1. Out-of-band recovery verification
  2. Phishing-resistant MFA
  3. Adaptive authentication
  4. Session reauthentication

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Risk-adaptive policies increase required assurance when contextual signals indicate elevated risk. By contrast, Out-of-band recovery verification is relevant when a caller claiming to be a director asks the help desk to bypass normal password reset controls, not as a substitute for Adaptive authentication in this case.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Independent verification through a trusted channel reduces social-engineering risk during recovery; its proper use case is one in which a caller claiming to be a director asks the help desk to bypass normal password reset controls, not one in which a valid sign-in from a suspicious device should trigger additional verification.

B:

Origin-bound authenticators such as FIDO2 passkeys resist credential relay to lookalike sites; this provides its benefit when attackers successfully relay one-time codes from fake login pages to real services; the matter at hand is instead that a valid sign-in from a suspicious device should trigger additional verification.

D:

Step-up reauthentication verifies recent user presence before high-impact operations; it helps when a user changes a sensitive payment instruction in a long-lived authenticated session, whereas the present requirement arises because a valid sign-in from a suspicious device should trigger additional verification.

Question 365

Repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account. What is the best-targeted intervention?

  1. Account lockout policy
  2. Out-of-band recovery verification
  3. Adaptive authentication
  4. Session reauthentication

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Lockout and throttling limit guessing rate while requiring controls against denial-of-service abuse. By contrast, Session reauthentication is relevant when a user changes a sensitive payment instruction in a long-lived authenticated session, not as a substitute for Account lockout policy in this case.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Independent verification through a trusted channel reduces social-engineering risk during recovery; the alternative concern is that a caller claiming to be a director asks the help desk to bypass normal password reset controls, but the tested need stems from the fact that repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account.

C:

Risk-adaptive policies increase required assurance when contextual signals indicate elevated risk; the alternative concern is that a valid sign-in from a suspicious device should trigger additional verification, but the tested need stems from the fact that repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account.

D:

Step-up reauthentication verifies recent user presence before high-impact operations; the condition for this measure is that a user changes a sensitive payment instruction in a long-lived authenticated session, whereas the current question concerns a case where repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account.

Question 366

A password is confirmed exposed in a phishing campaign and active sessions may persist. What should the decision-maker choose?

  1. Credential rotation after compromise
  2. Hardware security key
  3. Adaptive authentication
  4. Account lockout policy
  5. Out-of-band recovery verification

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Compromise response revokes sessions, resets affected credentials, and investigates unauthorized use. By contrast, Account lockout policy is relevant when repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account, not as a substitute for Credential rotation after compromise in this case.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Security keys perform cryptographic challenge responses while protecting local key material; this provides its benefit when privileged users need a portable authenticator whose private key does not leave the device; the matter at hand is instead that a password is confirmed exposed in a phishing campaign and active sessions may persist.

C:

Risk-adaptive policies increase required assurance when contextual signals indicate elevated risk; such an effect addresses a situation where a valid sign-in from a suspicious device should trigger additional verification rather than the situation where a password is confirmed exposed in a phishing campaign and active sessions may persist.

D:

Lockout and throttling limit guessing rate while requiring controls against denial-of-service abuse; this is pertinent when repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account, in contrast with the actual gap where a password is confirmed exposed in a phishing campaign and active sessions may persist.

E:

Independent verification through a trusted channel reduces social-engineering risk during recovery; it helps when a caller claiming to be a director asks the help desk to bypass normal password reset controls, whereas the present requirement arises because a password is confirmed exposed in a phishing campaign and active sessions may persist.

Question 367

A caller claiming to be a director asks the help desk to bypass normal password reset controls. What action would satisfy this constraint most directly?

  1. Time-based one-time password
  2. Out-of-band recovery verification
  3. Account lockout policy
  4. Adaptive authentication

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Independent verification through a trusted channel reduces social-engineering risk during recovery. By contrast, Adaptive authentication is relevant when a valid sign-in from a suspicious device should trigger additional verification, not as a substitute for Out-of-band recovery verification in this case.

Incorrect Answers

A:

TOTP generates short-lived codes from a shared secret and time without binding to the genuine site; it helps when the team needs a second factor that works offline but recognizes its phishing limitations, whereas the present requirement arises because a caller claiming to be a director asks the help desk to bypass normal password reset controls.

C:

Lockout and throttling limit guessing rate while requiring controls against denial-of-service abuse; it would be a fit if repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account, whereas the required response must deal with the fact that a caller claiming to be a director asks the help desk to bypass normal password reset controls.

D:

Risk-adaptive policies increase required assurance when contextual signals indicate elevated risk; this provides its benefit when a valid sign-in from a suspicious device should trigger additional verification; the matter at hand is instead that a caller claiming to be a director asks the help desk to bypass normal password reset controls.

Question 368

A user changes a sensitive payment instruction in a long-lived authenticated session. What approach should the accountable team prioritize?

  1. Hardware security key
  2. Account lockout policy
  3. Time-based one-time password
  4. Session reauthentication

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Step-up reauthentication verifies recent user presence before high-impact operations. By contrast, Time-based one-time password is relevant when the team needs a second factor that works offline but recognizes its phishing limitations, not as a substitute for Session reauthentication in this case.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Security keys perform cryptographic challenge responses while protecting local key material; that helps with the separate case where privileged users need a portable authenticator whose private key does not leave the device, not with the issue that a user changes a sensitive payment instruction in a long-lived authenticated session.

B:

Lockout and throttling limit guessing rate while requiring controls against denial-of-service abuse; this provides its benefit when repeated online password guesses should be slowed without permanently disabling every account; the matter at hand is instead that a user changes a sensitive payment instruction in a long-lived authenticated session.

C:

TOTP generates short-lived codes from a shared secret and time without binding to the genuine site; this provides its benefit when the team needs a second factor that works offline but recognizes its phishing limitations; the matter at hand is instead that a user changes a sensitive payment instruction in a long-lived authenticated session.

Question 369

A regional bank is reducing the impact of privileged credential compromise. Engineers need administrative rights only during short, approved maintenance windows. What action would satisfy this constraint most directly?

  1. Just-in-time privilege
  2. Privileged access workstation
  3. Break-glass account
  4. Dual control for critical changes

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

JIT elevation grants temporary privileges and removes standing authority after the approved task. By contrast, Privileged access workstation is relevant when administrators manage production from devices also used for browsing unknown websites, not as a substitute for Just-in-time privilege in this case.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Dedicated hardened workstations reduce exposure of privileged sessions to ordinary endpoint threats; that is relevant if administrators manage production from devices also used for browsing unknown websites, but it does not directly resolve the need arising when engineers need administrative rights only during short, approved maintenance windows.

C:

Emergency accounts provide tightly governed alternate access with monitoring and periodic validation; this is pertinent when a primary identity provider may be unavailable during a critical outage, in contrast with the actual gap where engineers need administrative rights only during short, approved maintenance windows.

D:

Dual control requires independent authorization for actions capable of bypassing critical safeguards; that is relevant if one administrator can alter both payment rules and the logging that would reveal the change, but it does not directly resolve the need arising when engineers need administrative rights only during short, approved maintenance windows.

Question 370

Administrators manage production from devices also used for browsing unknown websites. What approach should the accountable team prioritize?

  1. Privileged session recording
  2. Privileged access workstation
  3. Password vaulting
  4. Privileged access review

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Dedicated hardened workstations reduce exposure of privileged sessions to ordinary endpoint threats. By contrast, Privileged access review is relevant when a former project administrator still holds domain-level rights months after assignment completion, not as a substitute for Privileged access workstation in this case.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Session recording retains a controlled audit trail of privileged activity under approved privacy rules; the condition for this measure is that investigators need accountability for commands executed during sensitive vendor maintenance, whereas the current question concerns a case where administrators manage production from devices also used for browsing unknown websites.

C:

A vault centrally protects secrets and supports controlled checkout, audit, and rotation; the alternative concern is that multiple teams share an administrator password stored in unmanaged documents, but the tested need stems from the fact that administrators manage production from devices also used for browsing unknown websites.

D:

Privileged reviews detect unnecessary high-impact rights and enforce time-bounded authorization; deploying it would matter if a former project administrator still holds domain-level rights months after assignment completion, but the deciding issue here is that administrators manage production from devices also used for browsing unknown websites.

EC-Council Certified CISO (712-50) Practice Tests